Claude Agent Skill · by Anthropics

Reconciliation

Install Reconciliation skill for Claude Code from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins.

Install
Terminal · npx
$npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill brainstorming
Works with Paperclip

How Reconciliation fits into a Paperclip company.

Reconciliation drops into any Paperclip agent that handles this kind of work. Assign it to a specialist inside a pre-configured PaperclipOrg company and the skill becomes available on every heartbeat — no prompt engineering, no tool wiring.

S
SaaS FactoryPaired

Pre-configured AI company — 18 agents, 18 skills, one-time purchase.

$27$59
Explore pack
Source file
SKILL.md175 lines
Expand
---name: reconciliationdescription: Reconcile accounts by comparing GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data. Use when performing bank reconciliations, GL-to-subledger recs, intercompany reconciliations, or identifying and categorizing reconciling items.argument-hint: "<account> [period]"--- # Reconciliation **Important**: This skill assists with reconciliation workflows but does not provide financial advice. All reconciliations should be reviewed by qualified financial professionals before sign-off. Methodology and best practices for account reconciliation, including GL-to-subledger, bank reconciliations, and intercompany. Covers reconciling item categorization, aging analysis, and escalation. ## Reconciliation Types ### GL to Subledger Reconciliation Compare the general ledger control account balance to the detailed subledger balance. **Common accounts:**- Accounts receivable (GL control vs AR subledger aging)- Accounts payable (GL control vs AP subledger aging)- Fixed assets (GL control vs fixed asset register)- Inventory (GL control vs inventory valuation report)- Prepaid expenses (GL control vs prepaid amortization schedule)- Accrued liabilities (GL control vs accrual detail schedules) **Process:**1. Pull GL balance for the control account as of period end2. Pull subledger trial balance or detail report as of the same date3. Compare totals — they should match if posting is real-time4. Investigate any differences (timing of posting, manual entries not reflected, interface errors) **Common causes of differences:**- Manual journal entries posted to the control account but not reflected in the subledger- Subledger transactions not yet interfaced to the GL- Timing differences in batch posting- Reclassification entries in the GL without subledger adjustment- System interface errors or failed postings ### Bank Reconciliation Compare the GL cash balance to the bank statement balance. **Process:**1. Obtain the bank statement balance as of period end2. Pull the GL cash account balance as of the same date3. Identify outstanding checks (issued but not cleared at the bank)4. Identify deposits in transit (recorded in GL but not yet credited by bank)5. Identify bank charges, interest, or adjustments not yet recorded in GL6. Reconcile both sides to an adjusted balance **Standard format:** ```Balance per bank statement:         $XX,XXXAdd: Deposits in transit            $X,XXXLess: Outstanding checks           ($X,XXX)Add/Less: Bank errors               $X,XXXAdjusted bank balance:              $XX,XXX Balance per general ledger:         $XX,XXXAdd: Interest/credits not recorded  $X,XXXLess: Bank fees not recorded       ($X,XXX)Add/Less: GL errors                 $X,XXXAdjusted GL balance:                $XX,XXX Difference:                         $0.00``` ### Intercompany Reconciliation Reconcile balances between related entities to ensure they net to zero on consolidation. **Process:**1. Pull intercompany receivable/payable balances for each entity pair2. Compare Entity A's receivable from Entity B to Entity B's payable to Entity A3. Identify and resolve differences4. Confirm all intercompany transactions have been recorded on both sides5. Verify elimination entries are correct for consolidation **Common causes of differences:**- Transactions recorded by one entity but not the other (timing)- Different FX rates used by each entity- Misclassification (intercompany vs third-party)- Disputed amounts or unapplied payments- Different period-end cut-off practices across entities ## Reconciling Item Categorization ### Category 1: Timing Differences Items that exist because of normal processing timing and will clear without action: - **Outstanding checks:** Checks issued and recorded in GL, pending bank clearance- **Deposits in transit:** Deposits made and recorded in GL, pending bank credit- **In-transit transactions:** Items posted in one system but pending interface to the other- **Pending approvals:** Transactions awaiting approval to post in one system **Expected resolution:** These items should clear within the normal processing cycle (typically 1-5 business days). No adjusting entry needed. ### Category 2: Adjustments Required Items that require a journal entry to correct: - **Unrecorded bank charges:** Bank fees, wire charges, returned item fees- **Unrecorded interest:** Interest income or expense from bank/lender- **Recording errors:** Wrong amount, wrong account, duplicates- **Missing entries:** Transactions in one system with no corresponding entry in the other- **Classification errors:** Correctly recorded but in the wrong account **Action:** Prepare adjusting journal entry to correct the GL or subledger. ### Category 3: Requires Investigation Items that cannot be immediately explained: - **Unidentified differences:** Variances with no obvious cause- **Disputed items:** Amounts contested between parties- **Aged outstanding items:** Items that have not cleared within expected timeframes- **Recurring unexplained differences:** Same type of difference appearing each period **Action:** Investigate root cause, document findings, escalate if unresolved. ## Aging Analysis for Outstanding Items Track the age of reconciling items to identify stale items requiring escalation: | Age Bucket | Status | Action ||-----------|--------|--------|| 0-30 days | Current | Monitor — within normal processing cycle || 31-60 days | Aging | Investigate — follow up on why item has not cleared || 61-90 days | Overdue | Escalate — notify supervisor, document investigation || 90+ days | Stale | Escalate to management — potential write-off or adjustment needed | ### Aging Report Format | Item # | Description | Amount | Date Originated | Age (Days) | Category | Status | Owner ||--------|-------------|--------|-----------------|------------|----------|--------|-------|| 1      | [Detail]    | $X,XXX | [Date]          | XX         | [Type]   | [Status] | [Name] | ### Trending Track reconciling item totals over time to identify growing balances: - Compare total outstanding items to prior period- Flag if total reconciling items exceed materiality threshold- Flag if number of items is growing period over period- Identify recurring items that appear every period (may indicate process issue) ## Escalation Thresholds Define escalation triggers based on your organization's risk tolerance: | Trigger | Threshold (Example) | Escalation ||---------|---------------------|------------|| Individual item amount | > $10,000 | Supervisor review || Individual item amount | > $50,000 | Controller review || Total reconciling items | > $100,000 | Controller review || Item age | > 60 days | Supervisor follow-up || Item age | > 90 days | Controller / management review || Unreconciled difference | Any amount | Cannot close — must resolve or document || Growing trend | 3+ consecutive periods | Process improvement investigation | *Note: Set thresholds based on your organization's materiality level and risk appetite. The examples above are illustrative.* ## Reconciliation Best Practices 1. **Timeliness:** Complete reconciliations within the close calendar deadline (typically T+3 to T+5 business days after period end)2. **Completeness:** Reconcile all balance sheet accounts on a defined frequency (monthly for material accounts, quarterly for immaterial)3. **Documentation:** Every reconciliation should include preparer, reviewer, date, and clear explanation of all reconciling items4. **Segregation:** The person who reconciles should not be the same person who processes transactions in that account5. **Follow-through:** Track open items to resolution — do not just carry items forward indefinitely6. **Root cause analysis:** For recurring reconciling items, investigate and fix the underlying process issue7. **Standardization:** Use consistent templates and procedures across all accounts8. **Retention:** Maintain reconciliations and supporting detail per your organization's document retention policy