npx skills add https://github.com/zhanghandong/rust-skills --skill m06-error-handlingHow M06 Error Handling fits into a Paperclip company.
M06 Error Handling drops into any Paperclip agent that handles this kind of work. Assign it to a specialist inside a pre-configured PaperclipOrg company and the skill becomes available on every heartbeat — no prompt engineering, no tool wiring.
Pre-configured AI company — 18 agents, 18 skills, one-time purchase.
SKILL.md166 linesExpandCollapse
---name: m06-error-handlingdescription: "CRITICAL: Use for error handling. Triggers: Result, Option, Error, ?, unwrap, expect, panic, anyhow, thiserror, when to panic vs return Result, custom error, error propagation, 错误处理, Result 用法, 什么时候用 panic"user-invocable: false--- # Error Handling > **Layer 1: Language Mechanics** ## Core Question **Is this failure expected or a bug?** Before choosing error handling strategy:- Can this fail in normal operation?- Who should handle this failure?- What context does the caller need? --- ## Error → Design Question | Pattern | Don't Just Say | Ask Instead ||---------|----------------|-------------|| unwrap panics | "Use ?" | Is None/Err actually possible here? || Type mismatch on ? | "Use anyhow" | Are error types designed correctly? || Lost error context | "Add .context()" | What does the caller need to know? || Too many error variants | "Use Box<dyn Error>" | Is error granularity right? | --- ## Thinking Prompt Before handling an error: 1. **What kind of failure is this?** - Expected → Result<T, E> - Absence normal → Option<T> - Bug/invariant → panic! - Unrecoverable → panic! 2. **Who handles this?** - Caller → propagate with ? - Current function → match/if-let - User → friendly error message - Programmer → panic with message 3. **What context is needed?** - Type of error → thiserror variants - Call chain → anyhow::Context - Debug info → anyhow or tracing --- ## Trace Up ↑ When error strategy is unclear: ```"Should I return Result or Option?" ↑ Ask: Is absence/failure normal or exceptional? ↑ Check: m09-domain (what does domain say?) ↑ Check: domain-* (error handling requirements)``` | Situation | Trace To | Question ||-----------|----------|----------|| Too many unwraps | m09-domain | Is the data model right? || Error context design | m13-domain-error | What recovery is needed? || Library vs app errors | m11-ecosystem | Who are the consumers? | --- ## Trace Down ↓ From design to implementation: ```"Expected failure, library code" ↓ Use: thiserror for typed errors "Expected failure, application code" ↓ Use: anyhow for ergonomic errors "Absence is normal (find, get, lookup)" ↓ Use: Option<T> "Bug or invariant violation" ↓ Use: panic!, assert!, unreachable! "Need to propagate with context" ↓ Use: .context("what was happening")``` --- ## Quick Reference | Pattern | When | Example ||---------|------|---------|| `Result<T, E>` | Recoverable error | `fn read() -> Result<String, io::Error>` || `Option<T>` | Absence is normal | `fn find() -> Option<&Item>` || `?` | Propagate error | `let data = file.read()?;` || `unwrap()` | Dev/test only | `config.get("key").unwrap()` || `expect()` | Invariant holds | `env.get("HOME").expect("HOME set")` || `panic!` | Unrecoverable | `panic!("critical failure")` | ## Library vs Application | Context | Error Crate | Why ||---------|-------------|-----|| Library | `thiserror` | Typed errors for consumers || Application | `anyhow` | Ergonomic error handling || Mixed | Both | thiserror at boundaries, anyhow internally | ## Decision Flowchart ```Is failure expected?├─ Yes → Is absence the only "failure"?│ ├─ Yes → Option<T>│ └─ No → Result<T, E>│ ├─ Library → thiserror│ └─ Application → anyhow└─ No → Is it a bug? ├─ Yes → panic!, assert! └─ No → Consider if really unrecoverable Use ? → Need context?├─ Yes → .context("message")└─ No → Plain ?``` --- ## Common Errors | Error | Cause | Fix ||-------|-------|-----|| `unwrap()` panic | Unhandled None/Err | Use `?` or match || Type mismatch | Different error types | Use `anyhow` or `From` || Lost context | `?` without context | Add `.context()` || `cannot use ?` | Missing Result return | Return `Result<(), E>` | --- ## Anti-Patterns | Anti-Pattern | Why Bad | Better ||--------------|---------|--------|| `.unwrap()` everywhere | Panics in production | `.expect("reason")` or `?` || Ignore errors silently | Bugs hidden | Handle or propagate || `panic!` for expected errors | Bad UX, no recovery | Result || Box<dyn Error> everywhere | Lost type info | thiserror | --- ## Related Skills | When | See ||------|-----|| Domain error strategy | m13-domain-error || Crate boundaries | m11-ecosystem || Type-safe errors | m05-type-driven || Mental models | m14-mental-model |Coding Guidelines
The coding-guidelines skill provides developers with Rust-specific code style standards and best practices, covering naming conventions, data types, error handl
M01 Ownership
The m01-ownership skill diagnoses and resolves Rust ownership, borrowing, and lifetime errors by guiding developers to understand data ownership requirements ra
M02 Resource
m02-resource guides developers through selecting appropriate smart pointers and resource management patterns in Rust by asking design questions rather than pres