npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill market-sizing-analysisHow Market Sizing Analysis fits into a Paperclip company.
Market Sizing Analysis drops into any Paperclip agent that handles this kind of work. Assign it to a specialist inside a pre-configured PaperclipOrg company and the skill becomes available on every heartbeat — no prompt engineering, no tool wiring.
Pre-configured AI company — 18 agents, 18 skills, one-time purchase.
SKILL.md430 linesExpandCollapse
---name: market-sizing-analysisdescription: Calculate TAM/SAM/SOM for market opportunities using top-down, bottom-up, and value theory methodologies. Use this skill when sizing markets, estimating addressable revenue, validating market opportunity for a new venture, or building investor-ready market analysis for a startup pitch or business plan.version: 1.0.0--- # Market Sizing Analysis Comprehensive market sizing methodologies for calculating Total Addressable Market (TAM), Serviceable Available Market (SAM), and Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM) for startup opportunities. ## Overview Market sizing provides the foundation for startup strategy, fundraising, and business planning. Calculate market opportunity using three complementary methodologies: top-down (industry reports), bottom-up (customer segment calculations), and value theory (willingness to pay). ## Core Concepts ### The Three-Tier Market Framework **TAM (Total Addressable Market)** - Total revenue opportunity if achieving 100% market share- Defines the universe of potential customers- Used for long-term vision and market validation- Example: All email marketing software revenue globally **SAM (Serviceable Available Market)** - Portion of TAM targetable with current product/service- Accounts for geographic, segment, or capability constraints- Represents realistic addressable opportunity- Example: AI-powered email marketing for e-commerce in North America **SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market)** - Realistic market share achievable in 3-5 years- Accounts for competition, resources, and market dynamics- Used for financial projections and fundraising- Example: 2-5% of SAM based on competitive landscape ### When to Use Each Methodology **Top-Down Analysis** - Use when established market research exists- Best for mature, well-defined markets- Validates market existence and growth- Starts with industry reports and narrows down **Bottom-Up Analysis** - Use when targeting specific customer segments- Best for new or niche markets- Most credible for investors- Builds from customer data and pricing **Value Theory** - Use when creating new market categories- Best for disruptive innovations- Estimates based on value creation- Calculates willingness to pay for problem solution ## Three-Methodology Framework ### Methodology 1: Top-Down Analysis Start with total market size and narrow to addressable segments. **Process:** 1. Identify total market category from research reports2. Apply geographic filters (target regions)3. Apply segment filters (target industries/customers)4. Calculate competitive positioning adjustments **Formula:** ```TAM = Total Market Category SizeSAM = TAM × Geographic % × Segment %SOM = SAM × Realistic Capture Rate (2-5%)``` **When to use:** Established markets with available research (e.g., SaaS, fintech, e-commerce) **Strengths:** Quick, uses credible data, validates market existence **Limitations:** May overestimate for new categories, less granular ### Methodology 2: Bottom-Up Analysis Build market size from customer segment calculations. **Process:** 1. Define target customer segments2. Estimate number of potential customers per segment3. Determine average revenue per customer4. Calculate realistic penetration rates **Formula:** ```TAM = Σ (Segment Size × Annual Revenue per Customer)SAM = TAM × (Segments You Can Serve / Total Segments)SOM = SAM × Realistic Penetration Rate (Year 3-5)``` **When to use:** B2B, niche markets, specific customer segments **Strengths:** Most credible for investors, granular, defensible **Limitations:** Requires detailed customer research, time-intensive ### Methodology 3: Value Theory Calculate based on value created and willingness to pay. **Process:** 1. Identify problem being solved2. Quantify current cost of problem (time, money, inefficiency)3. Calculate value of solution (savings, gains, efficiency)4. Estimate willingness to pay (typically 10-30% of value)5. Multiply by addressable customer base **Formula:** ```Value per Customer = Problem Cost × % Solved by SolutionPrice per Customer = Value × Willingness to Pay % (10-30%)TAM = Total Potential Customers × Price per CustomerSAM = TAM × % Meeting Buy CriteriaSOM = SAM × Realistic Adoption Rate``` **When to use:** New categories, disruptive innovations, unclear existing markets **Strengths:** Shows value creation, works for new markets **Limitations:** Requires assumptions, harder to validate ## Step-by-Step Process ### Step 1: Define the Market Clearly specify what market is being measured. **Questions to answer:** - What problem is being solved?- Who are the target customers?- What's the product/service category?- What's the geographic scope?- What's the time horizon? **Example:** - Problem: E-commerce companies struggle with email marketing automation- Customers: E-commerce stores with >$1M annual revenue- Category: AI-powered email marketing software- Geography: North America initially, global expansion- Horizon: 3-5 year opportunity ### Step 2: Gather Data Sources Identify credible data for calculations. **Top-Down Sources:** - Industry research reports (Gartner, Forrester, IDC)- Government statistics (Census, BLS, trade associations)- Public company filings and earnings- Market research firms (Statista, CB Insights, PitchBook) **Bottom-Up Sources:** - Customer interviews and surveys- Sales data and CRM records- Industry databases (LinkedIn, ZoomInfo, Crunchbase)- Competitive intelligence- Academic research **Value Theory Sources:** - Customer problem quantification- Time/cost studies- ROI case studies- Pricing research and willingness-to-pay surveys ### Step 3: Calculate TAM Apply chosen methodology to determine total market. **For Top-Down:** 1. Find total category size from research2. Document data source and year3. Apply growth rate if needed4. Validate with multiple sources **For Bottom-Up:** 1. Count total potential customers2. Calculate average annual revenue per customer3. Multiply to get TAM4. Break down by segment **For Value Theory:** 1. Quantify total addressable customer base2. Calculate value per customer3. Estimate pricing based on value4. Multiply for TAM ### Step 4: Calculate SAM Narrow TAM to serviceable addressable market. **Apply Filters:** - Geographic constraints (regions you can serve)- Product limitations (features you currently have)- Customer requirements (size, industry, use case)- Distribution channel access- Regulatory or compliance restrictions **Formula:** ```SAM = TAM × (% matching all filters)``` **Example:** - TAM: $10B global email marketing- Geographic filter: 40% (North America)- Product filter: 30% (e-commerce focus)- Feature filter: 60% (need AI capabilities)- SAM = $10B × 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.60 = $720M ### Step 5: Calculate SOM Determine realistic obtainable market share. **Consider:** - Current market share of competitors- Typical market share for new entrants (2-5%)- Resources available (funding, team, time)- Go-to-market effectiveness- Competitive advantages- Time to achieve (3-5 years typically) **Conservative Approach:** ```SOM (Year 3) = SAM × 2%SOM (Year 5) = SAM × 5%``` **Example:** - SAM: $720M- Year 3 SOM: $720M × 2% = $14.4M- Year 5 SOM: $720M × 5% = $36M ### Step 6: Validate and Triangulate Cross-check using multiple methods. **Validation Techniques:** 1. Compare top-down and bottom-up results (should be within 30%)2. Check against public company revenues in space3. Validate customer count assumptions4. Sense-check pricing assumptions5. Review with industry experts6. Compare to similar market categories **Red Flags:** - TAM that's too small (< $1B for VC-backed startups)- TAM that's too large (unsupported by data)- SOM that's too aggressive (> 10% in 5 years for new entrant)- Inconsistency between methodologies (> 50% difference) ## Industry-Specific Considerations ### SaaS Markets **Key Metrics:** - Number of potential businesses in target segment- Average contract value (ACV)- Typical market penetration rates- Expansion revenue potential **TAM Calculation:** ```TAM = Total Target Companies × Average ACV × (1 + Expansion Rate)``` ### Marketplace Markets **Key Metrics:** - Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) of category- Take rate (% of GMV you capture)- Total transactions or users **TAM Calculation:** ```TAM = Total Category GMV × Expected Take Rate``` ### Consumer Markets **Key Metrics:** - Total addressable users/households- Average revenue per user (ARPU)- Engagement frequency **TAM Calculation:** ```TAM = Total Users × ARPU × Purchase Frequency per Year``` ### B2B Services **Key Metrics:** - Number of target companies by size/industry- Average project value or retainer- Typical buying frequency **TAM Calculation:** ```TAM = Total Target Companies × Average Deal Size × Deals per Year``` ## Presenting Market Sizing ### For Investors **Structure:** 1. Market definition and problem scope2. TAM/SAM/SOM with methodology3. Data sources and assumptions4. Growth projections and drivers5. Competitive landscape context **Key Points:** - Lead with bottom-up calculation (most credible)- Show triangulation with top-down- Explain conservative assumptions- Link to revenue projections- Highlight market growth rate ### For Strategy **Structure:** 1. Addressable customer segments2. Prioritization by opportunity size3. Entry strategy by segment4. Expected penetration timeline5. Resource requirements **Key Points:** - Focus on SAM and SOM- Show segment-level detail- Connect to go-to-market plan- Identify expansion opportunities- Discuss competitive positioning ## Common Mistakes to Avoid **Mistake 1: Confusing TAM with SAM** - Don't claim entire market as addressable- Apply realistic product/geographic constraints- Be honest about serviceable market **Mistake 2: Overly Aggressive SOM** - New entrants rarely capture > 5% in 5 years- Account for competition and resources- Show realistic ramp timeline **Mistake 3: Using Only Top-Down** - Investors prefer bottom-up validation- Top-down alone lacks credibility- Always triangulate with multiple methods **Mistake 4: Cherry-Picking Data** - Use consistent, recent data sources- Don't mix methodologies inappropriately- Document all assumptions clearly **Mistake 5: Ignoring Market Dynamics** - Account for market growth/decline- Consider competitive intensity- Factor in switching costs and barriers ## Quick Start To perform market sizing analysis: 1. **Define the market** - Problem, customers, category, geography2. **Choose methodology** - Bottom-up (preferred) or top-down + triangulation3. **Gather data** - Industry reports, customer data, competitive intelligence4. **Calculate TAM** - Apply methodology formula5. **Narrow to SAM** - Apply product, geographic, segment filters6. **Estimate SOM** - 2-5% realistic capture rate7. **Validate** - Cross-check with alternative methods8. **Document** - Show methodology, sources, assumptions9. **Present** - Structure for audience (investors, strategy, operations)Accessibility Compliance
This walks you through implementing proper WCAG 2.2 compliance with real code patterns for screen readers, keyboard navigation, and mobile accessibility. It cov
Airflow Dag Patterns
If you're building data pipelines with Airflow, this skill gives you production-ready DAG patterns that actually work in the real world. It covers TaskFlow API
Angular Migration
Migrating from AngularJS to Angular is notoriously painful, and this skill tackles the practical stuff that makes or breaks these projects. It covers hybrid app