PaperclipOrg
Claude Agent Skill · by Pbakaus

Audit

This is a systematic code auditor that runs measurable quality checks across five dimensions: accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-p

Install
Terminal · npx
$npx skills add https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable --skill audit
Works with Paperclip

How Audit fits into a Paperclip company.

Audit drops into any Paperclip agent that handles this kind of work. Assign it to a specialist inside a pre-configured PaperclipOrg company and the skill becomes available on every heartbeat — no prompt engineering, no tool wiring.

S
SaaS FactoryPaired

Pre-configured AI company — 18 agents, 18 skills, one-time purchase.

$27$59
Explore pack
Source file
SKILL.md148 lines
Expand
---name: auditdescription: Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.version: 2.1.1user-invocable: trueargument-hint: "[area (feature, page, component...)]"--- ## MANDATORY PREPARATION Invoke /impeccable — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the **Context Gathering Protocol**. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /impeccable teach first. --- Run systematic **technical** quality checks and generate a comprehensive report. Don't fix issues — document them for other commands to address. This is a code-level audit, not a design critique. Check what's measurable and verifiable in the implementation. ## Diagnostic Scan Run comprehensive checks across 5 dimensions. Score each dimension 0-4 using the criteria below. ### 1. Accessibility (A11y) **Check for**:- **Contrast issues**: Text contrast ratios < 4.5:1 (or 7:1 for AAA)- **Missing ARIA**: Interactive elements without proper roles, labels, or states- **Keyboard navigation**: Missing focus indicators, illogical tab order, keyboard traps- **Semantic HTML**: Improper heading hierarchy, missing landmarks, divs instead of buttons- **Alt text**: Missing or poor image descriptions- **Form issues**: Inputs without labels, poor error messaging, missing required indicators **Score 0-4**: 0=Inaccessible (fails WCAG A), 1=Major gaps (few ARIA labels, no keyboard nav), 2=Partial (some a11y effort, significant gaps), 3=Good (WCAG AA mostly met, minor gaps), 4=Excellent (WCAG AA fully met, approaches AAA) ### 2. Performance **Check for**:- **Layout thrashing**: Reading/writing layout properties in loops- **Expensive animations**: Animating layout properties (width, height, top, left) instead of transform/opacity- **Missing optimization**: Images without lazy loading, unoptimized assets, missing will-change- **Bundle size**: Unnecessary imports, unused dependencies- **Render performance**: Unnecessary re-renders, missing memoization **Score 0-4**: 0=Severe issues (layout thrash, unoptimized everything), 1=Major problems (no lazy loading, expensive animations), 2=Partial (some optimization, gaps remain), 3=Good (mostly optimized, minor improvements possible), 4=Excellent (fast, lean, well-optimized) ### 3. Theming **Check for**:- **Hard-coded colors**: Colors not using design tokens- **Broken dark mode**: Missing dark mode variants, poor contrast in dark theme- **Inconsistent tokens**: Using wrong tokens, mixing token types- **Theme switching issues**: Values that don't update on theme change **Score 0-4**: 0=No theming (hard-coded everything), 1=Minimal tokens (mostly hard-coded), 2=Partial (tokens exist but inconsistently used), 3=Good (tokens used, minor hard-coded values), 4=Excellent (full token system, dark mode works perfectly) ### 4. Responsive Design **Check for**:- **Fixed widths**: Hard-coded widths that break on mobile- **Touch targets**: Interactive elements < 44x44px- **Horizontal scroll**: Content overflow on narrow viewports- **Text scaling**: Layouts that break when text size increases- **Missing breakpoints**: No mobile/tablet variants **Score 0-4**: 0=Desktop-only (breaks on mobile), 1=Major issues (some breakpoints, many failures), 2=Partial (works on mobile, rough edges), 3=Good (responsive, minor touch target or overflow issues), 4=Excellent (fluid, all viewports, proper touch targets) ### 5. Anti-Patterns (CRITICAL) Check against ALL the **DON'T** guidelines in the impeccable skill. Look for AI slop tells (AI color palette, gradient text, glassmorphism, hero metrics, card grids, generic fonts) and general design anti-patterns (gray on color, nested cards, bounce easing, redundant copy). **Score 0-4**: 0=AI slop gallery (5+ tells), 1=Heavy AI aesthetic (3-4 tells), 2=Some tells (1-2 noticeable), 3=Mostly clean (subtle issues only), 4=No AI tells (distinctive, intentional design) ## Generate Report ### Audit Health Score | # | Dimension | Score | Key Finding ||---|-----------|-------|-------------|| 1 | Accessibility | ? | [most critical a11y issue or "--"] || 2 | Performance | ? | || 3 | Responsive Design | ? | || 4 | Theming | ? | || 5 | Anti-Patterns | ? | || **Total** | | **??/20** | **[Rating band]** | **Rating bands**: 18-20 Excellent (minor polish), 14-17 Good (address weak dimensions), 10-13 Acceptable (significant work needed), 6-9 Poor (major overhaul), 0-5 Critical (fundamental issues) ### Anti-Patterns Verdict**Start here.** Pass/fail: Does this look AI-generated? List specific tells. Be brutally honest. ### Executive Summary- Audit Health Score: **??/20** ([rating band])- Total issues found (count by severity: P0/P1/P2/P3)- Top 3-5 critical issues- Recommended next steps ### Detailed Findings by Severity Tag every issue with **P0-P3 severity**:- **P0 Blocking**: Prevents task completion — fix immediately- **P1 Major**: Significant difficulty or WCAG AA violation — fix before release- **P2 Minor**: Annoyance, workaround exists — fix in next pass- **P3 Polish**: Nice-to-fix, no real user impact — fix if time permits For each issue, document:- **[P?] Issue name**- **Location**: Component, file, line- **Category**: Accessibility / Performance / Theming / Responsive / Anti-Pattern- **Impact**: How it affects users- **WCAG/Standard**: Which standard it violates (if applicable)- **Recommendation**: How to fix it- **Suggested command**: Which command to use (prefer: /animate, /quieter, /shape, /optimize, /adapt, /clarify, /layout, /distill, /delight, /audit, /harden, /polish, /bolder, /typeset, /critique, /colorize, /overdrive) ### Patterns & Systemic Issues Identify recurring problems that indicate systemic gaps rather than one-off mistakes:- "Hard-coded colors appear in 15+ components, should use design tokens"- "Touch targets consistently too small (<44px) throughout mobile experience" ### Positive Findings Note what's working well — good practices to maintain and replicate. ## Recommended Actions List recommended commands in priority order (P0 first, then P1, then P2): 1. **[P?] `/command-name`** — Brief description (specific context from audit findings)2. **[P?] `/command-name`** — Brief description (specific context) **Rules**: Only recommend commands from: /animate, /quieter, /shape, /optimize, /adapt, /clarify, /layout, /distill, /delight, /audit, /harden, /polish, /bolder, /typeset, /critique, /colorize, /overdrive. Map findings to the most appropriate command. End with `/polish` as the final step if any fixes were recommended. After presenting the summary, tell the user: > You can ask me to run these one at a time, all at once, or in any order you prefer.>> Re-run `/audit` after fixes to see your score improve. **IMPORTANT**: Be thorough but actionable. Too many P3 issues creates noise. Focus on what actually matters. **NEVER**:- Report issues without explaining impact (why does this matter?)- Provide generic recommendations (be specific and actionable)- Skip positive findings (celebrate what works)- Forget to prioritize (everything can't be P0)- Report false positives without verification Remember: You're a technical quality auditor. Document systematically, prioritize ruthlessly, cite specific code locations, and provide clear paths to improvement.