npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill verification-before-completionHow Verification Before Completion fits into a Paperclip company.
Verification Before Completion drops into any Paperclip agent that handles this kind of work. Assign it to a specialist inside a pre-configured PaperclipOrg company and the skill becomes available on every heartbeat — no prompt engineering, no tool wiring.
Pre-configured AI company — 18 agents, 18 skills, one-time purchase.
SKILL.md139 linesExpandCollapse
---name: verification-before-completiondescription: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always--- # Verification Before Completion ## Overview Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency. **Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always. **Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.** ## The Iron Law ```NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE``` If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes. ## The Gate Function ```BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction: 1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim? - If NO: State actual status with evidence - If YES: State claim WITH evidence5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim Skip any step = lying, not verifying``` ## Common Failures | Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient ||-------|----------|----------------|| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" || Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation || Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good || Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed || Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once || Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" || Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing | ## Red Flags - STOP - Using "should", "probably", "seems to"- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)- About to commit/push/PR without verification- Trusting agent success reports- Relying on partial verification- Thinking "just this once"- Tired and wanting work over- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification** ## Rationalization Prevention | Excuse | Reality ||--------|---------|| "Should work now" | RUN the verification || "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence || "Just this once" | No exceptions || "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler || "Agent said success" | Verify independently || "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse || "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing || "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter | ## Key Patterns **Tests:**```✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"``` **Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**```✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)``` **Build:**```✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)``` **Requirements:**```✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"``` **Agent delegation:**```✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state❌ Trust agent report``` ## Why This Matters From 24 failure memories:- your human partner said "I don't believe you" - trust broken- Undefined functions shipped - would crash- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework- Violates: "Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced." ## When To Apply **ALWAYS before:**- ANY variation of success/completion claims- ANY expression of satisfaction- ANY positive statement about work state- Committing, PR creation, task completion- Moving to next task- Delegating to agents **Rule applies to:**- Exact phrases- Paraphrases and synonyms- Implications of success- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness ## The Bottom Line **No shortcuts for verification.** Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result. This is non-negotiable.Brainstorming
Forces Claude to actually think before coding, which frankly should be the default but isn't. Blocks all implementation until you've walked through context expl
Dispatching Parallel Agents
When you've got multiple independent failures across different test files or subsystems, this cuts debugging time by running separate agents in parallel instead
Executing Plans
Takes a written implementation plan and executes it step by step with proper checkpoints. Loads the plan file, reviews it critically for gaps or unclear instruc