npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill agent-governanceHow Agent Governance fits into a Paperclip company.
Agent Governance drops into any Paperclip agent that handles this kind of work. Assign it to a specialist inside a pre-configured PaperclipOrg company and the skill becomes available on every heartbeat — no prompt engineering, no tool wiring.
Pre-configured AI company — 18 agents, 18 skills, one-time purchase.
SKILL.md569 linesExpandCollapse
---name: agent-governancedescription: | Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)--- # Agent Governance Patterns Patterns for adding safety, trust, and policy enforcement to AI agent systems. ## Overview Governance patterns ensure AI agents operate within defined boundaries — controlling which tools they can call, what content they can process, how much they can do, and maintaining accountability through audit trails. ```User Request → Intent Classification → Policy Check → Tool Execution → Audit Log ↓ ↓ ↓ Threat Detection Allow/Deny Trust Update``` ## When to Use - **Agents with tool access**: Any agent that calls external tools (APIs, databases, shell commands)- **Multi-agent systems**: Agents delegating to other agents need trust boundaries- **Production deployments**: Compliance, audit, and safety requirements- **Sensitive operations**: Financial transactions, data access, infrastructure management --- ## Pattern 1: Governance Policy Define what an agent is allowed to do as a composable, serializable policy object. ```pythonfrom dataclasses import dataclass, fieldfrom enum import Enumfrom typing import Optionalimport re class PolicyAction(Enum): ALLOW = "allow" DENY = "deny" REVIEW = "review" # flag for human review @dataclassclass GovernancePolicy: """Declarative policy controlling agent behavior.""" name: str allowed_tools: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # allowlist blocked_tools: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # blocklist blocked_patterns: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # content filters max_calls_per_request: int = 100 # rate limit require_human_approval: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # tools needing approval def check_tool(self, tool_name: str) -> PolicyAction: """Check if a tool is allowed by this policy.""" if tool_name in self.blocked_tools: return PolicyAction.DENY if tool_name in self.require_human_approval: return PolicyAction.REVIEW if self.allowed_tools and tool_name not in self.allowed_tools: return PolicyAction.DENY return PolicyAction.ALLOW def check_content(self, content: str) -> Optional[str]: """Check content against blocked patterns. Returns matched pattern or None.""" for pattern in self.blocked_patterns: if re.search(pattern, content, re.IGNORECASE): return pattern return None``` ### Policy Composition Combine multiple policies (e.g., org-wide + team + agent-specific): ```pythondef compose_policies(*policies: GovernancePolicy) -> GovernancePolicy: """Merge policies with most-restrictive-wins semantics.""" combined = GovernancePolicy(name="composed") for policy in policies: combined.blocked_tools.extend(policy.blocked_tools) combined.blocked_patterns.extend(policy.blocked_patterns) combined.require_human_approval.extend(policy.require_human_approval) combined.max_calls_per_request = min( combined.max_calls_per_request, policy.max_calls_per_request ) if policy.allowed_tools: if combined.allowed_tools: combined.allowed_tools = [ t for t in combined.allowed_tools if t in policy.allowed_tools ] else: combined.allowed_tools = list(policy.allowed_tools) return combined # Usage: layer policies from broad to specificorg_policy = GovernancePolicy( name="org-wide", blocked_tools=["shell_exec", "delete_database"], blocked_patterns=[r"(?i)(api[_-]?key|secret|password)\s*[:=]"], max_calls_per_request=50)team_policy = GovernancePolicy( name="data-team", allowed_tools=["query_db", "read_file", "write_report"], require_human_approval=["write_report"])agent_policy = compose_policies(org_policy, team_policy)``` ### Policy as YAML Store policies as configuration, not code: ```yaml# governance-policy.yamlname: production-agentallowed_tools: - search_documents - query_database - send_emailblocked_tools: - shell_exec - delete_recordblocked_patterns: - "(?i)(api[_-]?key|secret|password)\\s*[:=]" - "(?i)(drop|truncate|delete from)\\s+\\w+"max_calls_per_request: 25require_human_approval: - send_email``` ```pythonimport yaml def load_policy(path: str) -> GovernancePolicy: with open(path) as f: data = yaml.safe_load(f) return GovernancePolicy(**data)``` --- ## Pattern 2: Semantic Intent Classification Detect dangerous intent in prompts before they reach the agent, using pattern-based signals. ```pythonfrom dataclasses import dataclass @dataclassclass IntentSignal: category: str # e.g., "data_exfiltration", "privilege_escalation" confidence: float # 0.0 to 1.0 evidence: str # what triggered the detection # Weighted signal patterns for threat detectionTHREAT_SIGNALS = [ # Data exfiltration (r"(?i)send\s+(all|every|entire)\s+\w+\s+to\s+", "data_exfiltration", 0.8), (r"(?i)export\s+.*\s+to\s+(external|outside|third.?party)", "data_exfiltration", 0.9), (r"(?i)curl\s+.*\s+-d\s+", "data_exfiltration", 0.7), # Privilege escalation (r"(?i)(sudo|as\s+root|admin\s+access)", "privilege_escalation", 0.8), (r"(?i)chmod\s+777", "privilege_escalation", 0.9), # System modification (r"(?i)(rm\s+-rf|del\s+/[sq]|format\s+c:)", "system_destruction", 0.95), (r"(?i)(drop\s+database|truncate\s+table)", "system_destruction", 0.9), # Prompt injection (r"(?i)ignore\s+(previous|above|all)\s+(instructions?|rules?)", "prompt_injection", 0.9), (r"(?i)you\s+are\s+now\s+(a|an)\s+", "prompt_injection", 0.7),] def classify_intent(content: str) -> list[IntentSignal]: """Classify content for threat signals.""" signals = [] for pattern, category, weight in THREAT_SIGNALS: match = re.search(pattern, content) if match: signals.append(IntentSignal( category=category, confidence=weight, evidence=match.group() )) return signals def is_safe(content: str, threshold: float = 0.7) -> bool: """Quick check: is the content safe above the given threshold?""" signals = classify_intent(content) return not any(s.confidence >= threshold for s in signals)``` **Key insight**: Intent classification happens *before* tool execution, acting as a pre-flight safety check. This is fundamentally different from output guardrails which only check *after* generation. --- ## Pattern 3: Tool-Level Governance Decorator Wrap individual tool functions with governance checks: ```pythonimport functoolsimport timefrom collections import defaultdict _call_counters: dict[str, int] = defaultdict(int) def govern(policy: GovernancePolicy, audit_trail=None): """Decorator that enforces governance policy on a tool function.""" def decorator(func): @functools.wraps(func) async def wrapper(*args, **kwargs): tool_name = func.__name__ # 1. Check tool allowlist/blocklist action = policy.check_tool(tool_name) if action == PolicyAction.DENY: raise PermissionError(f"Policy '{policy.name}' blocks tool '{tool_name}'") if action == PolicyAction.REVIEW: raise PermissionError(f"Tool '{tool_name}' requires human approval") # 2. Check rate limit _call_counters[policy.name] += 1 if _call_counters[policy.name] > policy.max_calls_per_request: raise PermissionError(f"Rate limit exceeded: {policy.max_calls_per_request} calls") # 3. Check content in arguments for arg in list(args) + list(kwargs.values()): if isinstance(arg, str): matched = policy.check_content(arg) if matched: raise PermissionError(f"Blocked pattern detected: {matched}") # 4. Execute and audit start = time.monotonic() try: result = await func(*args, **kwargs) if audit_trail is not None: audit_trail.append({ "tool": tool_name, "action": "allowed", "duration_ms": (time.monotonic() - start) * 1000, "timestamp": time.time() }) return result except Exception as e: if audit_trail is not None: audit_trail.append({ "tool": tool_name, "action": "error", "error": str(e), "timestamp": time.time() }) raise return wrapper return decorator # Usage with any agent frameworkaudit_log = []policy = GovernancePolicy( name="search-agent", allowed_tools=["search", "summarize"], blocked_patterns=[r"(?i)password"], max_calls_per_request=10) @govern(policy, audit_trail=audit_log)async def search(query: str) -> str: """Search documents — governed by policy.""" return f"Results for: {query}" # Passes: search("latest quarterly report")# Blocked: search("show me the admin password")``` --- ## Pattern 4: Trust Scoring Track agent reliability over time with decay-based trust scores: ```pythonfrom dataclasses import dataclass, fieldimport mathimport time @dataclassclass TrustScore: """Trust score with temporal decay.""" score: float = 0.5 # 0.0 (untrusted) to 1.0 (fully trusted) successes: int = 0 failures: int = 0 last_updated: float = field(default_factory=time.time) def record_success(self, reward: float = 0.05): self.successes += 1 self.score = min(1.0, self.score + reward * (1 - self.score)) self.last_updated = time.time() def record_failure(self, penalty: float = 0.15): self.failures += 1 self.score = max(0.0, self.score - penalty * self.score) self.last_updated = time.time() def current(self, decay_rate: float = 0.001) -> float: """Get score with temporal decay — trust erodes without activity.""" elapsed = time.time() - self.last_updated decay = math.exp(-decay_rate * elapsed) return self.score * decay @property def reliability(self) -> float: total = self.successes + self.failures return self.successes / total if total > 0 else 0.0 # Usage in multi-agent systemstrust = TrustScore() # Agent completes tasks successfullytrust.record_success() # 0.525trust.record_success() # 0.549 # Agent makes an errortrust.record_failure() # 0.467 # Gate sensitive operations on trustif trust.current() >= 0.7: # Allow autonomous operation passelif trust.current() >= 0.4: # Allow with human oversight passelse: # Deny or require explicit approval pass``` **Multi-agent trust**: In systems where agents delegate to other agents, each agent maintains trust scores for its delegates: ```pythonclass AgentTrustRegistry: def __init__(self): self.scores: dict[str, TrustScore] = {} def get_trust(self, agent_id: str) -> TrustScore: if agent_id not in self.scores: self.scores[agent_id] = TrustScore() return self.scores[agent_id] def most_trusted(self, agents: list[str]) -> str: return max(agents, key=lambda a: self.get_trust(a).current()) def meets_threshold(self, agent_id: str, threshold: float) -> bool: return self.get_trust(agent_id).current() >= threshold``` --- ## Pattern 5: Audit Trail Append-only audit log for all agent actions — critical for compliance and debugging: ```pythonfrom dataclasses import dataclass, fieldimport jsonimport time @dataclassclass AuditEntry: timestamp: float agent_id: str tool_name: str action: str # "allowed", "denied", "error" policy_name: str details: dict = field(default_factory=dict) class AuditTrail: """Append-only audit trail for agent governance events.""" def __init__(self): self._entries: list[AuditEntry] = [] def log(self, agent_id: str, tool_name: str, action: str, policy_name: str, **details): self._entries.append(AuditEntry( timestamp=time.time(), agent_id=agent_id, tool_name=tool_name, action=action, policy_name=policy_name, details=details )) def denied(self) -> list[AuditEntry]: """Get all denied actions — useful for security review.""" return [e for e in self._entries if e.action == "denied"] def by_agent(self, agent_id: str) -> list[AuditEntry]: return [e for e in self._entries if e.agent_id == agent_id] def export_jsonl(self, path: str): """Export as JSON Lines for log aggregation systems.""" with open(path, "w") as f: for entry in self._entries: f.write(json.dumps({ "timestamp": entry.timestamp, "agent_id": entry.agent_id, "tool": entry.tool_name, "action": entry.action, "policy": entry.policy_name, **entry.details }) + "\n")``` --- ## Pattern 6: Framework Integration ### PydanticAI ```pythonfrom pydantic_ai import Agent policy = GovernancePolicy( name="support-bot", allowed_tools=["search_docs", "create_ticket"], blocked_patterns=[r"(?i)(ssn|social\s+security|credit\s+card)"], max_calls_per_request=20) agent = Agent("openai:gpt-4o", system_prompt="You are a support assistant.") @agent.tool@govern(policy)async def search_docs(ctx, query: str) -> str: """Search knowledge base — governed.""" return await kb.search(query) @agent.tool@govern(policy)async def create_ticket(ctx, title: str, body: str) -> str: """Create support ticket — governed.""" return await tickets.create(title=title, body=body)``` ### CrewAI ```pythonfrom crewai import Agent, Task, Crew policy = GovernancePolicy( name="research-crew", allowed_tools=["search", "analyze"], max_calls_per_request=30) # Apply governance at the crew leveldef governed_crew_run(crew: Crew, policy: GovernancePolicy): """Wrap crew execution with governance checks.""" audit = AuditTrail() for agent in crew.agents: for tool in agent.tools: original = tool.func tool.func = govern(policy, audit_trail=audit)(original) result = crew.kickoff() return result, audit``` ### OpenAI Agents SDK ```pythonfrom agents import Agent, function_tool policy = GovernancePolicy( name="coding-agent", allowed_tools=["read_file", "write_file", "run_tests"], blocked_tools=["shell_exec"], max_calls_per_request=50) @function_tool@govern(policy)async def read_file(path: str) -> str: """Read file contents — governed.""" import os safe_path = os.path.realpath(path) if not safe_path.startswith(os.path.realpath(".")): raise ValueError("Path traversal blocked by governance") with open(safe_path) as f: return f.read()``` --- ## Governance Levels Match governance strictness to risk level: | Level | Controls | Use Case ||-------|----------|----------|| **Open** | Audit only, no restrictions | Internal dev/testing || **Standard** | Tool allowlist + content filters | General production agents || **Strict** | All controls + human approval for sensitive ops | Financial, healthcare, legal || **Locked** | Allowlist only, no dynamic tools, full audit | Compliance-critical systems | --- ## Best Practices | Practice | Rationale ||----------|-----------|| **Policy as configuration** | Store policies in YAML/JSON, not hardcoded — enables change without deploys || **Most-restrictive-wins** | When composing policies, deny always overrides allow || **Pre-flight intent check** | Classify intent *before* tool execution, not after || **Trust decay** | Trust scores should decay over time — require ongoing good behavior || **Append-only audit** | Never modify or delete audit entries — immutability enables compliance || **Fail closed** | If governance check errors, deny the action rather than allowing it || **Separate policy from logic** | Governance enforcement should be independent of agent business logic | --- ## Quick Start Checklist ```markdown## Agent Governance Implementation Checklist ### Setup- [ ] Define governance policy (allowed tools, blocked patterns, rate limits)- [ ] Choose governance level (open/standard/strict/locked)- [ ] Set up audit trail storage ### Implementation- [ ] Add @govern decorator to all tool functions- [ ] Add intent classification to user input processing- [ ] Implement trust scoring for multi-agent interactions- [ ] Wire up audit trail export ### Validation- [ ] Test that blocked tools are properly denied- [ ] Test that content filters catch sensitive patterns- [ ] Test rate limiting behavior- [ ] Verify audit trail captures all events- [ ] Test policy composition (most-restrictive-wins)``` --- ## Related Resources - [Agent Governance Toolkit](https://github.com/microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit) — Full governance framework- [AgentMesh Integrations](https://github.com/microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit/tree/main/packages/agentmesh-integrations) — Framework-specific packages- [OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/)Add Educational Comments
Takes any code file and transforms it into a teaching resource by adding educational comments that explain syntax, design choices, and language concepts. Automa
Agentic Eval
Implements self-critique loops where Claude generates output, evaluates it against your criteria, then refines based on its own feedback. Includes evaluator-opt
Ai Prompt Engineering Safety Review
The ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review skill analyzes AI prompts for safety risks, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness using a structured evaluat